您的位置: 标准下载 » 国内标准 » GB 国标 »

GB/T 28195-2011 玻璃软化点测试方法

时间:2024-05-19 14:20:37 来源: 标准资料网 作者:标准资料网 阅读:8308
下载地址: 点击此处下载
基本信息
标准名称:玻璃软化点测试方法
英文名称:Determination of softening point for glass
中标分类: 仪器、仪表 >> 实验室仪器与真空仪器 >> 实验室用玻璃、陶瓷、塑料器皿
ICS分类: 玻璃和陶瓷工业 >> 玻璃 >> 玻璃综合
发布部门:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局 中国国家标准化管理委员会
发布日期:2011-12-30
实施日期:2012-09-01
首发日期:2011-12-30
作废日期:
主管部门:全国玻璃仪器标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 178)
提出单位:中国轻工业联合会
归口单位:全国玻璃仪器标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 178)
起草单位:国家轻工业玻璃产品质量监督检测中心
起草人:杜玉海、原苓玉、刘柏军、杨建新、梁叶、袁春梅
出版社:中国标准出版社
出版日期:2012-09-01
页数:12页
适用范围

本标准规定了玻璃软化点的测试方法。
本标准适用于所有批量生产玻璃软化点的测试。

前言

没有内容

目录

没有内容

引用标准

没有内容

所属分类: 仪器 仪表 实验室仪器与真空仪器 实验室用玻璃 陶瓷 塑料器皿 玻璃和陶瓷工业 玻璃 玻璃综合
Product Code:SAE AS8049
Title:Performance Standard for Seats in Civil Rotorcraft, Transport Aircraft, and General Aviation Aircraft
Issuing Committee:Aircraft Seat Committee
Scope: This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) defines minimum performance standards, qualification requirements, and minimum documentation requirements for passenger and crew seats in civil rotorcraft, transport aircraft, and general aviation aircraft. The goal is to achieve comfort, durability, and occupant protection under normal operational loads and to define test and evaluation criteria to demonstrate occupant protection when a seat/occupant/restraint system is subjected to statically applied ultimate loads and to dynamic impact test conditions set forth in the applicable Federal Regulations 14 CFR 23, 25, 27, or 29.Guidance for test procedures, measurements, equipment, and interpretation of results is also presented to promote uniform techniques and to achieve acceptable data.While this document addresses system performance, responsibility for the seating system is divided between the seat supplier and the installation applicant. The seat supplier's responsibility consists of meeting all the seat system performance requirements and obtaining and supplying to the installation applicant all the data prescribed by this document. The installation applicant has the ultimate system responsibility in assuring that all requirements for safe seat installation have been met.
Rationale: This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) defines minimum performance standards, qualification requirements, and minimum documentation requirements for passenger and crew seats in civil rotorcraft, transport aircraft, and general aviation aircraft. The goal is to achieve comfort, durability, and occupant protection under normal operational loads and to define test and evaluation criteria to demonstrate occupant protection when a seat/occupant/restraint system is subjected to statically applied ultimate loads and to dynamic impact test conditions set forth in the applicable Federal Regulations 14 CFR 23, 25, 27, or 29.Guidance for test procedures, measurements, equipment, and interpretation of results is also presented to promote uniform techniques and to achieve acceptable data.While this document addresses system performance, responsibility for the seating system is divided between the seat supplier and the installation applicant. The seat supplier's responsibility consists of meeting all the seat system performance requirements and obtaining and supplying to the installation applicant all the data prescribed by this document. The installation applicant has the ultimate system responsibility in assuring that all requirements for safe seat installation have been met.【英文标准名称】:Healthinformatics-Servicearchitecture-Part1:Enterpriseviewpoint;EnglishversionEN12967-1:2007
【原文标准名称】:医学信息学.服务体系机构.第1部分:企业观点
【标准号】:DINEN12967-1-2008
【标准状态】:作废
【国别】:德国
【发布日期】:2008-02
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:德国标准化学会(DE-DIN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:兼容性;计算机科学;计算机软件;数据交换;数据处理;数据表示;定义;英语;企业;信息交流;信息交换;信息模式;情报系统;界面;接口(数据处理);层;医疗信息学;医学科学;公共卫生;规范(验收);结构;系统机构
【英文主题词】:Compatibility;Computersciences;Computersoftware;Dataexchange;Dataprocessing;Datarepresentation;Definition;Definitions;Englishlanguage;Enterprises;Informationexchange;Informationinterchange;Informationmodels;Informationsystems;Interfaces;Interfaces(dataprocessing);Layers;Medicalinformatics;Medicalsciences;Publichealth;Specification(approval);Structure;Systemarchitecture
【摘要】:ThisEuropeanstandardprovidesguidanceforthedescription,planninganddevelopmentofnewsystemsaswellasfortheintegrationofexistinginformationsystems,bothwithinoneenterpriseandacrossdifferenthealthcareorganisationsthroughanarchitectureintegratingthecommondataandbusinesslogicintoaspecificarchitecturallayer(i.e.themiddleware),distinctfromindividualapplicationsandaccessiblethroughoutthewholeinformationsystemthroughservices,asshowninFigure2ThearchitecturalprinciplesareformalisedaccordingtotheISO/IEC10746(allparts)criteriaandarethereforestructuredthroughthefollowingthreeviewpoints:a)Enterpriseviewpointthatspecifiesasetoffundamentalcommonrequirementsatenterpriselevelwithrespecttotheorganisationalpurposes,scopesandpoliciesthatmustbesupportedbytheinformationandfunctionalitiesofthemiddleware.Italsoprovidesguidanceonhowoneindividualenterprise(e.g.aregionalhealthcareauthority,alargehospitaloranyotherwherethismodelisapplicable)mayspecifyanddocumentadditionalspecificbusinessrequirements,withaviewofachievingacompletespecification,adequateforthecharacteristicsofthatenterprise.b)InformationviewpointthatspecifiesthefundamentalsemanticsoftheinformationmodeltobeimplementedbythemiddlewaretointegratethecommonenterprisedataandtosupporttheenterpriserequirementsformalisedintheEnterpriseviewpoint.Italsoprovidesguidanceonhowoneindividualenterprisemayextendthestandardmodelwithadditionalconcepts,neededtosupportlocalrequirementsintermsofinformationtobeputincommon.c)ComputationalviewpointthatspecifiesthescopeandcharacteristicsoftheservicesthatmustbeprovidedbythemiddlewareforallowingtheaccesstothecommondataaswellastheexecutionofthebusinesslogicsupportingtheenterpriseprocessesidentifiedintheInformationandEnterpriseviewpoints.Italsoprovidesguidanceonhowoneindividualenterprisemayspecifyadditionalservices,neededtosupportlocalspecificrequirementsintermsofbusinesslogictobeputincommon.Thestandardisalsoindependentfrom,anddoesnotimplyeitherexplicitlyorimplicitly,anyspecifictechnologicalsolutionorproductforitsdeployment.Accordingly,theformalisationofthearchitectureaccordingtotwolowerlevelsoftheODPreferencemodel,theEngineeringandTechnologyviewpointsisoutsidethescopeofthisstandard.ThelanguageandnotationsusedhereforspecifyingthearchitecturearebasedonUML(UnifiedModellingLanguage)complementedbycasestudiesandotherparadigmswidelyutilisedbyotherstandardsinhealthinformatics.Thelevelofthespecificationiscompleteandnon-ambiguousenoughtoallowitsimplementationintothespecificphysicalandtechnologicalscenariosadoptedbythevarioushealthcareorganisationsandvendors.ForthisexerciseitisrecommendedtofollowthemethodologyformalisedbytheEngineeringandTechnologyviewpointsoftheISOODPReferencemodel1.Thestandardisorganisedinthreeparts:--Part1(thispart)specifiestheoverallcharacteristicsofthearchitecture,formalisesthespecificationmethodologyandtheconformancecriteria,detailstheEnterpriseviewpointofthearchitecture;--Part2specifiestheInformationviewpointofthearchitecture;--Part3specifiestheComputationalviewpointofthearchitecture.
【中国标准分类号】:C07
【国际标准分类号】:35_240_80
【页数】:65P.;A4
【正文语种】:英语